UAS Pivoting Upper Control Arms GB Discussion thread

nah mate, nothing in the suspension is "legal" on my car lmao, even though it handles markedly better than a stock suspensioned Z, i was just saying i don't see why it is even an issue considering the number of forum members that have aftermarket suspensions which are in legal terms, illegal

 

Rob,
Can you kindly direct me to the Recruiting Officer of the Brothers-in-Arms(Local Division of the Acolyte Army)?
I do believe I would like to join up. :rofl::rofl::rofl:

 

Have not read everything here but it seems to be a classic 'attack the person' thread. If someone has problems with a product why don't they set them out in neutral language? That way non productive personal aspects don't intrude and confuse the issues and the supplier is given the opportunity to respond in kind.

With something like these arms, which have not reached the end users yet, the only way they can be criticised is on technical grounds, nothing has failed or prematurely worn out. But people who apparently don't have the required technical knowledge, or access to it, simply can't mount any credible technical criticism, its that simple.

Which is when the personal nonsense starts flying, pathetic.

 

I agree 100%.
Best of luck in trying to get that point accepted in this, and similar threads(throw in personal agenda, and you're in a 'no-win' situation from day 1).[TIS]

 

Hmmm really

Hey guys Baz has had ago at me let's not overdo it the other way, we might cop a bit of bad karma back. Even though this thread seemed to have turned into the pivoting arm subject basis, with the kicker being attack business and or personal attacks, which is a shame. Speaking of which, is calling someone arrogant or rude acceptable, as the mods think it is?
Hey Rob not all seen in pics, it does have O rings and other good bits.

BTW I have PMed Barry a few times trying to find out what the real problem is, and keep it off the forum, but won't say, or communicate anything, susbequent follow up pm's and email simply came back with, he did not feel he was obliged to reply so.

 

Who's getting personal now :rofl:[TIS]

 

NB

A review of all posts would show that Mods have deleted any 'slagging' ... of course those posts are deleted, so only Mods can fully review.

I have also refrained (until yesterday) and agree that Barry has NOT made any friends with his repeated questions. Yet Rob260 sees fit to have a go at me
Fact remains, if you read the entire thread, Barry raised Q's way back before he withdrew from the GB. More 'slagging' has been aimed at Barry (not deleted) and as I posted last night.... this whole issue is now way over the top!
Time to close it down I think????

 

OK, so will close this thread, if you feel it needs re-opening, send a mod a PM