As long as the NA driver's don't feel they need to prove anything... Just have to accept they won't compete with anything that's force-fed, so I wouldn't be dumping money into the thing. I'd miss the Torque from the Turbo's - you're only working with 3 litres which is nothing, the Turbo's are there to compensate for the lack of displacement. 160+KW ain't bad but they're by no means light cars to begin with. NA's just aren't fast... unless it's a Porsche GT3.
300ZX without turbos is like a woman without TiTis its a complete package with them . THE ONLY Z THAT CAME WITH TWIN TURBOS ...LEGEND MODEL :zlove: I wouldn't/couldn't own an N/A... each to their own ..
i got no choice, stupid p plate laws prevent us from driving turbo, but im getting a tt, i dont care anymore if i get done or not
The LS1 is the best engine ever made and LS1 powered commodores dominate all forms of motorsports, you ricers should wake up to yourselves.
Nah 300zx's with turbos are like girls with fake "force fed" TiTis, where as the non turbos are like nice girls with naturally aspirated ones
And we all know which ones we'd prefer to 'drive'. I'd rather a steering wheel than a PS3 controller.
Its funny those who went to the nissan datsun nationals there was very few 300Zeds in the top ten and yet we race against some very quick suzuki gtis say around wakefield, the track suits a high revving naturally aspirated rather than a laggy turbo for best track times
IF you are seriously racing in a TT you shouldnt be off boost EVER. Then there is NO lag. TT is always better than NA provided the spread of power is broad and not all top end like a dyno queen.
i am and always will be the biggest tt snob in the history of zed owners. I hate na's with a passion and dont believe any of these points make sense to me.
