what would you buy a 2 or 2+2?

Discussion in 'Non Technical' started by 95stillen25thAnniversy, Dec 8, 2012.

Page 1 of 4
  1. 95stillen25thAnniversy

    95stillen25thAnniversy New Member

    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    title says it all, just considering the pros and cons of both
     
    95stillen25thAnniversy, Dec 8, 2012
    #1
  2. Romonski

    Romonski And Justice For All

    Messages:
    2,219
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    38
    i have both so both. :D
     
    Romonski, Dec 8, 2012
    #2
  3. Anti

    Anti 14.7 x 14.7 = 44.1

    Messages:
    7,850
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Do you like red shirts or blue shirts?
     
    Anti, Dec 8, 2012
    #3
  4. Chrispy

    Chrispy Pretentious Upstart

    Messages:
    12,888
    Likes Received:
    368
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I had a 2+2. Got a 2+0 now. Much prefer the 2 seater, feels more like a sports car. Much snugger cabin. Boot is deeper too.
     
    Chrispy, Dec 8, 2012
    #4
  5. SIM300

    SIM300 FAKE MODERAT0R

    Messages:
    5,058
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I have both too. A 2+2 and a slicktop. I like both because they are Z32's :D
     
    SIM300, Dec 8, 2012
    #5
  6. Romonski

    Romonski And Justice For All

    Messages:
    2,219
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    38
    yeh easier to hide bodies in the boot of the 2 seater
     
    Romonski, Dec 8, 2012
    #6
  7. bRACKET

    bRACKET Do Right Dean

    Messages:
    3,037
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    2+0 is too stubby imo
     
    bRACKET, Dec 8, 2012
    #7
  8. 95stillen25thAnniversy

    95stillen25thAnniversy New Member

    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    what about driving differnces, power to weight, handeling and stuff like that?
     
    95stillen25thAnniversy, Dec 8, 2012
    #8
  9. Jamie

    Jamie Jamie The Hobbit

    Messages:
    2,251
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Oh god, not this topic again. It has been discussed extensively before, to save an absolute shit fight I suggest you use the search function :)
     
    Jamie, Dec 8, 2012
    #9
  10. kawasakirider

    kawasakirider New Member

    Messages:
    1,033
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I like the 2+2 because I have the convenience of the two extra seats if necessary.

    I have two small dogs and they fit perfectly in there on a regular basis. I wouldn't subject people to an extended trip in the back seats, but it's handy when going to the movies and shit.

    If I had to buy again I'd still go a 2+2.
     
    kawasakirider, Dec 8, 2012
    #10
  11. BLACK BEAST

    BLACK BEAST SLICKTOP TT R-SPEC

    Messages:
    4,062
    Likes Received:
    117
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Because race car


    .
     
    BLACK BEAST, Dec 8, 2012
    #11
  12. ryzan

    ryzan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    2,898
    Likes Received:
    150
    Trophy Points:
    63
    What he said
     
    ryzan, Dec 8, 2012
    #12
  13. SIM300

    SIM300 FAKE MODERAT0R

    Messages:
    5,058
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    38
    SIM300, Dec 8, 2012
    #13
  14. kakaboy

    kakaboy New Member

    Messages:
    1,506
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I had both and much prefer the 2 seater .
     
    kakaboy, Dec 8, 2012
    #14
  15. chevzed

    chevzed New Member

    Messages:
    360
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    depends how tall and fat you are
    my ass and head dont fit in a 2+0 so has to be a 2+2
     
    chevzed, Dec 8, 2012
    #15
  16. Bsmit410

    Bsmit410 New Member

    Messages:
    104
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    2+2 has better looks in my opinion, 2+0 looks out of proportion
     
    Bsmit410, Dec 9, 2012
    #16
  17. BLACK BEAST

    BLACK BEAST SLICKTOP TT R-SPEC

    Messages:
    4,062
    Likes Received:
    117
    Trophy Points:
    63
    pics says it all ..

    The 2+0 is definitely a better proportioned car

    2+2 has a rear end thats too long .



    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    BLACK BEAST, Dec 9, 2012
    #17
  18. SIM300

    SIM300 FAKE MODERAT0R

    Messages:
    5,058
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I wouldn't say this looks out of proportion:
    [​IMG]

    I love the look of them both (2+0/2+2) when done correctly, so you won't see me saying which I prefer as I love them both :zlove:
     
    SIM300, Dec 9, 2012
    #18
  19. MikeZ32

    MikeZ32 das Über member

    Messages:
    2,806
    Likes Received:
    115
    Trophy Points:
    63
    the problem isn't the longer rear but the annoying hump in the hatch glass. hate that.

    oh well, big arse needs a big wing. then it looks shmick.

    [​IMG]


    all said and done, if i had to do it again, i'd have a 2 seater but i'd never be foolish enough with money to 'invest' in another zed.
     
    MikeZ32, Dec 9, 2012
    #19
  20. Magic Z

    Magic Z New Member

    Messages:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    2+0 SMZ TT= best looking stock Z off a production line, pita only a handful made & only in the USA. Only 2+2 NA available here & 40 odd delivered, There is a mint 2+2 STZ NA on carsales OZ for 18k.
    2+0 is a perfect looking low buget sportscar from the 90's, definately not out of proportion & the short wheel base drive is a heap of fun.:cool:
    2+2 bit long & stretched IMO, but still like a mint well presented 2+2.
     
    Magic Z, Dec 9, 2012
    #20
Page 1 of 4

Share This Page