Z32 Standard ride height

Discussion in 'Technical' started by NI85, Feb 19, 2020.

  1. NI85

    NI85 Member

    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Location:
    Sydney
    For anyone that has standard ride height or someone that Knows 100%

    What is the Standard ride height from wheel center to peak of wheel arch?

    I can't measure ground clearance as my cars park on uneven ground... and where is that measurement taken from anyway?

    I have two Z32 cars. One feels lowered. The other definitely is. Both were bought the way they are.

    370mm from center to wheel arch (all four corners) Standard looking suspension

    340mm from center to wheel arch (all four corners) Coil-overs. (garage creeper barely fits under the front lip.)

    Searching I did find a comment in 2010 from "ztoy" He said "I was a king springs the other day and their
    lowered height was F-370mm R-360mm from center of the wheel to lip of guard. Their lowered height is -20mm so I would think that stock height is F-390mm R-380mm "

    So from that comment I gather both my cars are lowered; as the higher one is 370mm. Is it the case also that Front and rear are meant to be two different heights?
     
  2. zx299

    zx299 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,613
    Likes Received:
    74
    Trophy Points:
    48
    R370mm F360mm is the standard height on a TT (hub to wheel arch)

    I remember reading somewhere that the NA was 10mm higher all round but I can't verify that because I've never owned an NA

    Ground clearance (in NSW) is 100mm and the easiest way to check is by putting a house brick on its side and sliding it under the car .......... you can push it with a broom to verify clearances everywhere under your car (especially the exhaust)
     
  3. MagicMike

    MagicMike Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    7,383
    Likes Received:
    118
    Trophy Points:
    63
    From last zedfest, lowrider award, as measured on flat ground, sum of all 4 corners ground to wheel arch, the winner was Ryan, total 2569mm.

    Seems I only kept the lowest 3 car measurements.

    Not helpful, but gives you an indication of low. I was 3rd with 2605mm, and I wouldn't consider my car very low.
     
  4. NI85

    NI85 Member

    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Location:
    Sydney
    So the 2010 quote of King springs "lowered height was F-370mm R-360mm" would mean that an Non turbo could be lowered to Turbo's standard, but King springs couldn't lower the Turbo car.
    ------
    Those measurement for low rider seem weird to me. For one it seems to be missing a decimal point.
    As the numbers add up to 2.5/2.6 meters. :eek::p
    To apply those number with decimal point (26.5cm) from wheel center to wheel arch. On my lowered car that would put the front lip at a 2cm and 1.7 cm off the ground. If the exhaust sits lower on the car than the front lip. It would be scraping on the ground. That is Very Low.
     
  5. MagicMike

    MagicMike Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    7,383
    Likes Received:
    118
    Trophy Points:
    63
    As stated, they were measured from ground to arch. All 4 corners measured and added up.
     
  6. IB

    IB ?????

    Messages:
    2,396
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Doing rough calculation on tyre size, Ryan would have had an average of about 32 cm between centre of wheel and wheel arch.
     
  7. zx299

    zx299 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,613
    Likes Received:
    74
    Trophy Points:
    48
    King springs use their standard height spring on the front of the TT and give you the choice of standard or low for the rear

    They make a low front spring for the NA but it's a special order

    I used to run F340mm & R330mm but it just wasn't practical on country roads (or carparks :eek:) I added 20mm all round and I've never regretted it

    You have to decide if you want a zed to drive, or you just want one to look cool in the carpark :rolleyes:
     
  8. beaver

    beaver southern zeds

    Messages:
    5,690
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    yarra valley
    Agree, my car is 20mm lower all round, and is a pain ita, you have to watch where your driving at all times, nfg.
     
  9. NI85

    NI85 Member

    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Location:
    Sydney
    Sorry, I over looked the added up bit. Makes more sense now. :D
    -----
    Since the turbo height seems to be cleared up. What about Non turbo height standard?
     
  10. Dreilide

    Dreilide New Member

    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    You can't take it to a parking lot and measure?

    FSM states (Front/Rear, mm from ground to wheelarch):

    675/676 (NA 2+0)
    675/675 (TT 2+0, note this is for a US spec one with the smaller wider rear wheel)

    677/675 (NA 2+2)
    ???/??? (TT 2+2, not listed in US FSM)

    Top up tyre pressure and do math to compensate for non-stock wheel sizes. A little lower than those numbers would be expected for 30 yr old shocks.
     
  11. NI85

    NI85 Member

    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Location:
    Sydney

    Where in the FSM does it state the measurements? As my; Publication SM0E-oZ32Go FSM doesn't appear to have that information in:General Information, Maintenance, Front Suspension or the Rear Suspension sections.
     
  12. NI85

    NI85 Member

    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Location:
    Sydney
    Never mind I found it.

    The joys of early publications Lacking Information.

    The downloaded later years of scanned FSM's have the wheel arch height measurements written on the Front Suspension's S.D.S page.
     

Share This Page