i dont think awd is cheating...... neither the two turbos...because ours two turbos roughly equal the same size as a stock skyline one dont they???? so in the end they are pretty much the same...imho
I have a picture of the mid-4 car that nissan wanted to replace the zed with it looks similar to the honda nsx it had the vg30tt engine in it at the back (rear engine) just like the nsx plus it had the 4wd thats now used in the gtr but nissan scraped the project becouse the production costs where to high for that vihecle im so glad they dirent go ahead with this car becouse there would of been no zeds any more
I cant post pictures becouse i dont know how BUT look here http://zhome.com/History/MID-4.htm and learn more in depth history about our cars very intresting
aww yeah, i didnt think about that.....mmmm i reckon our lack of size (smaller so the punch isnt as big as one big one) would make up for our advantage of quicker spooling.......though our cars do just beat a skyline......but the turbo size is only a fraction of the reason we are quicker......imho
So if were saying 4wd is all that but the zed has all the power, why doesnt some one get a zed and put altessa in it......i assume thats the 4wd system right? 0 i would also like to point out that personally i think there is no point of high end hp ie.1000hp as is it really usable and when does the turbo kick in (6000rpm)....lol.....i would rather have something that comes in earlier........ btw i assume thats why plp go single turbo to twin turbo cars to get top end hp so they can get a huge turbo in it, is that the benifit of twin turbos that they are smaller and spool up faster........
lol yeah i agree....but most of the higher hp car eg 1000hp are just dyno queens.....except for the bugati or how ever you spell it for me....i use my baby as a daily driver so the most i am ideally aiming for is 450rwhp, whether that be in the next year or 5 years but i have no need to go greater than that
