I was using wary in the terms that... and this was based at the time of writing it, that if problems occur then perhaps you will not be looked after fully. However, we have since spoken and if indeed you are liable, which it appears you are, then you said you have no issues in paying. If that case I have no problems and would withdraw what I said. Although the problems I had with communication still remain, but that's another issue. btw have you verified what I found out yet?
I would also be unhappy about that> but just to set the record straight, I was not referring to your post, I was clearly referring to the post by "RobertBarr", as you will see if you look at the top of the page. I'm glad that some attempt has been made to set things right for you.Cheers Lloyd :-Z
lol I think we have to start enforcing... anti-plagiarism laws on the forum like Universities to stop the opinion fraud cut-and-paste posts lol.
Hey Zonny You are witty after all. Have you been to the Chili training camp for confusion and left field statements?
Discussed this very subject with Chili at Gilgandra. IMO we're better served by having members such as John (UAS) active on the forum than by banning them because they are operators of a Z-associated business. Their knowledge and enthusiasm is invaluable to all of us. It soon becomes obvious who the "Z-professionals" are and we can temper their posts accordingly, but the value remains. It's a pity that Simon from TTZ doesn't participate, as well as some of the other professionals mentioned in various posts by other members.
Playing Field Good to see common sense has prevailed ... Feedback from the professional and business guys is invaluable ... It's your choice where you buy from in the longer term ...
Common Sense Is not always common and I was starting to wonder, and good to see constructive and positive feed back. When you talk or communicate with someone, in this case mostly writen word, long enough you get to know what they are like and where their heart and interest is at.
