I had a 2+2. Got a 2+0 now. Much prefer the 2 seater, feels more like a sports car. Much snugger cabin. Boot is deeper too.
Oh god, not this topic again. It has been discussed extensively before, to save an absolute shit fight I suggest you use the search function
I like the 2+2 because I have the convenience of the two extra seats if necessary. I have two small dogs and they fit perfectly in there on a regular basis. I wouldn't subject people to an extended trip in the back seats, but it's handy when going to the movies and shit. If I had to buy again I'd still go a 2+2.
pics says it all .. The 2+0 is definitely a better proportioned car 2+2 has a rear end thats too long .
I wouldn't say this looks out of proportion: I love the look of them both (2+0/2+2) when done correctly, so you won't see me saying which I prefer as I love them both :zlove:
the problem isn't the longer rear but the annoying hump in the hatch glass. hate that. oh well, big arse needs a big wing. then it looks shmick. all said and done, if i had to do it again, i'd have a 2 seater but i'd never be foolish enough with money to 'invest' in another zed.
2+0 SMZ TT= best looking stock Z off a production line, pita only a handful made & only in the USA. Only 2+2 NA available here & 40 odd delivered, There is a mint 2+2 STZ NA on carsales OZ for 18k. 2+0 is a perfect looking low buget sportscar from the 90's, definately not out of proportion & the short wheel base drive is a heap of fun. 2+2 bit long & stretched IMO, but still like a mint well presented 2+2.