I can cope with that, as long as you 2+0 guys get that chip off your collective shoulders and accept that whilst you MAY have a point with "short arses look better"(small man syndrome at work here) "fat arses are more stable".:biggrin::biggrin::bash::bash::zlove:
its obvious ,people that drive 2 seaters have small dicks(big man ,small car syndrome),people that drive 2 seater turbos(well thats another story all together )
extra length and better handling ? i no what i'd choose. in all honesty i am happy i own a 300zx, its like and extra 40 centimeters or something. who cares anyway, there both awesome cars and both look hot.
I'm with you Tekky. Doubt there would be any noticable difference between the two on track, its not like there would be 5 seconds a lap difference between the two otherwise identical cars. To me the 2+2 is less of a sports car and more of a GT car than the 2 seater, could also make a nice boat out of one.:biggrin:
dont know if its because i own one but i really do find the 2+0 being more sexy. i realllllly find the 2+2 very long and wierd shaped even though its not heaps more longer... plus i actually love owning a 2 seater. i have never regretted owning a 2seater. i bought the car for me, not for other people. when i need to take other people and go somewhere i take another car.... plus what kind of adult can you fit comfortably in the back seats, would hate to have someone sit behind me making me sit heaps close to the steering wheel :bash:
IMO the 2+0's interior sh*ts on the 2+2's looks 10x better & feels more like a sports car. not as worried over which has the better side profile by 4" as the majority of the time im enjoying my car i'm inside it. dont blame us for that sh*t lol. i rekon there would be more 2+2's with veilside kits in total.
2x2 has advantages this is a none argument as to each his own. all i know you can have sex in the back seat of a 2x2, as hard as it is. in a two seater you cant guys with 2x2 zed need two extra seats they attract more chicks everyone knows 3 chicks are better than one.cheers bigmax:biggrin::zlove::thumbup:
Simon, I showed you my dick you said it was so much bigger than yours that there was no comparision. :bash: LMFAO I usually have sex on the beach or in a bed ( or the kitchen table ) . There are too many better options than the rear of a 2+2. Thats not a badge of honor.
To be honest I would have preffered a 2+0, but circumstances saw that I didn't end up with one. I've never said 'I'm so glad I got a 2+2!', I had the rear seats down and harnesses in for the first 2 years I owned it, only went up after the defect... As far as looks are concerened, I like both :zlove: Non Zedders can't even tell the difference most of the time. I love the smaller cabin in the 2+0, specially the slicktops. I've been lucky enough to have a drive of Macman's and it's really quite nice and actually does feel smaller than the 2+2. On the track... Hard to say, same amount of money and the same amount of skill, probably 2/5th's of stuff all. JP's car a 2+2, very fast. Fleet's car 2+0 Targa, very fast. Rob's car slicktop, will be very fast. :zlove:
why the hell would you disturb the nice interior you have. thats wat the boot and bonnet are for. plus you can admire your ride at the same time. tried and tested :zlove::zlove:
Given the two statements above, can you enlighten us on just how the interior appearance of the 2+0 outdoes the 2+2(remembering that the both cars share identical interiors from the front seats, forward)? Perhaps you're facing the wrong way in the car.:biggrin::biggrin:
I wanna hear from someone who has had sex with a woman, with her head hangin out the targas !!! While you are driving !!! Now that WOULD be an accomplishment to be proud of. Alex, I recon you should report back. Kirby is small enough for that !! Now tell me a slicktop is better !!! :bash:
