What is the 300zx's 60mph to zero braking distance.

Discussion in 'Technical' started by AdamZ, Apr 10, 2013.

  1. AdamZ

    AdamZ New Member

    I see some of the newest super cars braking close to 100 ft from 60mph to zero. What was the stock 300zx's distance?
     
  2. gmbrezzo

    gmbrezzo Moderator

  3. AdamZ

    AdamZ New Member

    That didn't give the 60 to 0 braking distance for the 300zx.

    Better yet I have a 2+2 TT with ABS. What is the distance.



     
  4. Jamie

    Jamie Jamie The Hobbit

    Double the length from one side to the middle?
     
  5. bRACKET

    bRACKET Do Right Dean

    Just measure the entire string.
     
  6. gmbrezzo

    gmbrezzo Moderator

    My best guess would be approx 120feet.
    A 2+2 TT is heavy and that is a lot of mass to pull up.

    Better still find a quiet piece of road and do a 60-0 test and tell us the results.
    don't forget the variables.
     
  7. SRB-2NV

    SRB-2NV #TEAMROB

    Don't expect too much, a Z32 has tiny brakes from factory(R32 gtst/s13 silvia size)
     
  8. AdamZ

    AdamZ New Member

    The whole 300zx is heavy comment is way over used. 1500-1600kg is not heavy by todays standards. A typical STi WRX, Evolution all way more than our zeds.

    So stock, 120 feet. With the brake upgrades available for the Zed, probably a feet less. I have the brake brace, SS lines, brake coolers and 6 pot front Brembos.

     
  9. WhiteNight

    WhiteNight Littering and...

    The Z was built in the era of performance cars that was least concerned with braking performance.

    Dont expect anything special in stock brakes.
     
  10. MagicMike

    MagicMike Moderator Staff Member

    Stock brakes are fine, as long as you only want to stop once.

    Suspension also greatly effects stopping distance.

    Tyres also obviously.

    Next question?
     
  11. ryzan

    ryzan Moderator Staff Member

    Actually z32 brakes are a common upgrade for s13 guys.
     
  12. Chrispy

    Chrispy Pretentious Upstart

    Buy my Brembo's :p
     
  13. MagicMike

    MagicMike Moderator Staff Member

    That's because they are poor [TIS]
     
  14. Mr G

    Mr G Active Member

  15. Nauraushaun

    Nauraushaun New Member

    But in the era they belong to, they're heavy. This was when an Evo was 1300kg, and the very-comparable Supra was ~100kg lighter (depending heavily of course on specification) as well. And everything else from Japan was lighter, making the 300 the heaviest of the bunch.
    But you have a point about modern cars. Isn't the GT-R like 1900kg? Ridiculous! And yet it's just so fast...
     
  16. AdamZ

    AdamZ New Member

    If this is correct than it is more than comparable to the top of the range sports car today. So if you have upgraded them like me and have 6 pot larger fronts calipers etc, our Z's braking is just as good as a lambo or ferrari's?



     
  17. Chrispy

    Chrispy Pretentious Upstart

    Doing it once is one thing, repeating it multiple times is another. Braking once is more of what your tyres will take than your brakes performance.
     
  18. Mr G

    Mr G Active Member

    Good point - as they mention after the braking test, there was noticeable brake fade around the track with the stock setup. A weekend warrior going through the twisties might have gone off the road because after an hour of thrashing it around, they braked while anticipating their brakes being able to handle the same limit...
     
  19. tassuperkart

    tassuperkart Its a lie I tell you!

    A set of suitable high performance brake pads with stock zed brakes will be capable far in excess of all but possibly an elite few on this forum under all but Targa or race track conditions.
    E
     
  20. yellow300zx

    yellow300zx Pimpin Ain't Easy

    Apart from the 2+0 slick tops (like I have) you can EASILY feel how light they are compared to 2+2 targa's. It's not all zeds, just the majority that are heavy :p
     

Share This Page