rear handbrake cables 2+2 tt same as n/a 2+2?

Discussion in 'Technical' started by kaza, Oct 18, 2012.

  1. kaza

    kaza Member

    Just planning on putting tt cables in n/a because subframe I got has 2 seated ones.
     
  2. Chrispy

    Chrispy Pretentious Upstart

    Don't see why they would be different.
     
  3. brisz

    brisz Well-Known Member

    FAST says JDM rear handbrake cables are the same in all similar seat chassis regardless of engine.

    Yes NA 2+2 rear hand brake cables will fit 2+2 TT.
     
  4. kaza

    kaza Member

    Cheers time to start pulling car apart :)
     
  5. Raheen

    Raheen Active Member

    Hold your horses

    When I swapped my 89 TT rear cradle with a 92 NA they were different, the difference that I came across was where the cable went through the stone shield. they each had a different body that bolted to the stone shield to hold the cable in place. I tossed up for a while which one I was goin to use before the job however when it came down to the alloy bit at the end of my TT was cracked and fell apart, just as well as it wouldnt have fitted to a NA stone shield and I couldnt be farked bulling the TT cradle apart just to use the stone shield on a NA cradle
     
  6. ryzan

    ryzan Moderator Staff Member

    Im guessing one subframe was 2+2 and the other 2+0? They're the only differences in handbrake cables.
     
  7. Raheen

    Raheen Active Member

    Yes

    Was a hard top so 2+0

     
  8. kaza

    kaza Member

    Worked out fine. 2+2 tt cables into a 2seater n/a subframe conversion.

    Off topic a bit.
    When I put rear diff and 5stud con, with brakes to s13. I was told to use n/a cables. because tt ones was different.
     

Share This Page