Dave there are a few in VIC...one in the preston area ive seen plus i saw another one on the way back on the freeway from the GOR cruise last year. Abraham
Why all the hate? Each to there own I guess. I quite like the convertible and would have one if i had the space and time to maintain 2 zeds. I might TT convert it, but I do like the look of them.
1991 Nissan 300ZX 1 of 1 Nissan 300ZX Hardtop Convertible 3.0L V6 Description: Engine : 3.0 V6 Body Style: Spyder Miles : 7505 Interior Color: White Exterior Color : Green Certified Price: 49,900 Have you ever seen a concept car at the auto show and wondered if you?d ever be able to buy one? This one-of-a-kind 1991 Nissan 300ZX hardtop convertible was custom built for the 1992 Geneva Auto Show by ASC as a possible production-ready version of a 300ZX convertible. Of course, you know that Nissan never built a hardtop convertible, instead preferring to go with a traditional folding cloth top, but the story doesn?t end there. Read on to find out more. Nissan redesigned its rear-drive sports car for introduction in spring 1989, adding a turbocharged model that fall. Two curvaceous body styles were offered: a 2-passenger coupe, and a 2+2 coupe with a small back seat. A 222-horsepower, 3.0-liter V-6 was standard in all models except the 300ZX Turbo, which came only in 2-seater form. Equipped with twin turbochargers and twin intercoolers (one set for each cylinder bank), the four-cam, 24-valve 3.0-liter engine developed 300 horsepower with the 5-speed manual, or 280 horsepower when fitted with a 4-speed automatic transmission. The automatic also was available with the 222 horsepower engine. The Turbo cars had intercooler inlets in the front air dam, a rear spoiler, Z-rated tires, and super HICAS (High Capacity Actively Controlled Steering) 4-wheel steering. That meant the rear wheels first turned slightly in the opposite direction from the front wheels, then in the same direction, to improve stability in fast lane-changes. Antilock braking was standard. Door-mounted front seatbelts could be left buckled, to deploy automatically. A T-top roof was standard on the Turbo model. Other 2-passenger coupes could have a fixed roof or the removable roof panels. The American Sunroof Corporation, or ASC, has been building convertibles for OEM applications for years, and when the new 300ZX came out, they knew it would only be a matter of time before Nissan would want to market a drop-top version. Introduced at the Geneva Auto Show on March 3, 1992, this Nissan 300ZX convertible with a retractable hardtop was built to highlight the ASC articulating hardtop technology in a fully functional sports vehicle. The challenge in building this vehicle came in retaining the full-width rear seat, which they managed to do, giving this car room for 4. The car features an all-metal folding hardtop that retracts and folds into the rear storage area with the touch of a single button. The key words with this important car are ?all-steel? and ?OEM?. ASC built this car as a proposal to Nissan for a convertible 300ZX, and as such, it is built to original equipment manufacturer (OEM) standards. This is not a one-off custom by some chop shop; this is a 100% production-ready prototype built by the company that builds convertibles for some of the world?s largest automakers. Because of this, every single part has been designed and built with OEM tolerances and finishes, with reliability and functionality on par with anything you would buy at a new car dealer. There are no cobbled-together bits from other convertibles on this Z; this is a fully-engineered hardtop convertible (the first since the Ford Retractable in 1959!) with full weather seals, finished upholstery, and no compromises. The rear window defroster works, the rear quarter windows are power actuated, and the rear seats are completely usable. It?s also important to note that this car is all steel. No fiberglass was used in the construction. On a project like this, fiberglass would be the obvious choice for its ease of fabrication and the ability to make complex shapes. However, as an OEM supplier, ASC knew they needed to design and build a system that would not only look great, but that would meet OEM standards for fit, finish and production feasibility. That meant steel. As a result, this car is incredibly solid and the workmanship is first-rate. Kudos to the craftsmen at ASC for making it not only functional, but attractive too. Given all the research and development that went into designing this car, not to mention the labor to actually build it, the cost on the project was more than three-quarters of a million dollars! Yes, you read that correctly ? this car cost nearly $800,000 to build in 1992. And now you can own it. The car itself is a stock 4-seater 1991 300ZX with a naturally aspirated 3.0 liter V6 making 222 horsepower and tied to a 5-speed manual transmission. It maintains all the original car?s features and amenities including power windows, power locks, power seats, 4-wheel disc brakes with ABS, A/C and a powerful AM/FM/CD stereo system with a touch screen interface. It rolls on a set of one-off 17-inch polished aluminum wheels with brand-new 245/40/17 ultra-high-performance tires. For the show, the car was painted in a custom color called Mayorka Green Pearl, which is sophisticated and very light-dependent. Under some conditions, it looks almost blue, but in bright sunlight, it?s a lovely turquoise. The 100% custom interior is ivory-colored leather with black accents. All the car?s original safety features have been retained, and the seats are incredibly comfortable. It loses none of its daily-driver functionality with the conversion to a convertible, and everything works perfectly. With just 7505 miles on the odometer, the car is in excellent condition throughout and has been used only sparingly as a show car by an ASC employee. Documentation includes the original ASC press kit for the 1992 Geneva Auto Show, slides, and other documentation relating to the program. This is truly a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to own a genuine prototype show car. So whatever happened to the ASC retractable hardtop program? I know I promised you the rest of the story, and it doesn?t end with this car. Although Nissan passed on this project and ultimately went on to produce a cloth-topped 2-seat 300ZX convertible, the idea of a retractable hardtop was immensely appealing to another high-tech Japanese automaker who was bringing an equally potent performance car to the market. That company is Mitsubishi, and the car became the 3000GT Spyder. So the investment and prototype work that went into making this 300ZX an OEM-grade convertible was not for nothing, as Mitsubishi put the ASC system into production in 1995. If you?re a Nissan fan, this is a unique opportunity to own a very important piece of history. The day is fast approaching when the Nissan Z-cars will take their rightful place in history alongside some important performance machinery, and the cars built in the early 90s rightfully deserve a spot on that list. They ushered in an era of high-performance, technology-laden, rear-wheel-drive Japanese sports coupes that delivered absolutely astounding performance. This car plays an important role in the development of two separate vehicles, is in outstanding condition and is documented. In terms of investments, this is as blue-chip as it gets, and you?ll enjoy your investment every time you push that single button and watch all that steel smoothly vanish beneath the deck lid. This car won?t last. Specifications: Basic Year 1991 Make Nissan Secondary Make n/a Model Name 300ZX Secondary Model n/a Vehicle Type Passenger Car Hobby Segment Sports Car Mileage 7505 Engine / Transmission Engine Type Gasoline Engine Size 3.0 V6 Engine Number n/a Fuel Specification n/a Fuel Delivery System Type Electronic Fuel Injection Transmission Type 5 Speed Manual Transmission Spec n/a Transmission Number n/a Misc Entertainment System Type n/a Battery Location n/a Battery Shut Off n/a Battery Charger n/a Interior Interior Color White Seating Type Bucket Seat Material Leather Shifter Type Floor Center Console Yes www.rkmotorscharlotte.com Posted by Pakdhe Nung at 7:30 AM
the site where I found this, is an Aussie site. http://myclassiccarantiqueandmuscle.blogspot.com.au/2012/10/nissan-300zx.html I was wondering if he was a forum member. It is a nice write up and includes some pics I hadn't seen. I note that this concept was based on the 2+2 PS: The basic pattern of those one off custom wheels look familiar (except less dish)
I met a guy the other day that came into work and told me he liked my zed, He then got his phone out to show me pictures of his , He has a brown convertible too , said he imported it himself 10 years ago . I told him about this site he said that he'd never heard of it and that he would join :zlove:
Crispy, BB and Scotty, some people must be because they can't make it work for them. Chocolate with cream interior, goes perfectly with tweed sports coat and cap. It is a very refined, gentleman's style, but doesn't look good on just any bloke.
Whats wrong with you all? I personally admire all of the Z32's no matter what configuration they have. I reckon the vert is one of the nicer looking zeds, especially with the roof down. Its a shame some of the purists on this site can not appreciate that. Not every car has to be a Z32 TT manual. Going by this then every other car out there that not is a piece of shit. Thats simply not the case. I thought we were all on the same side here.
Ive seen convertibles sell for good money, but then ive seen modified TTs sell for just as much if not more. Its one of those things, dependant on condition, k's etc. Also have to bear in mind just how rare the verts are compared to the other types of zed(even slicktops are far more common by comparison) I also believe the the convertible looks a little awkward from some angles, but theres not many convertibles of any age that dont. its about the driving experience as much as anything. For all the targa top owners out there, they probly agree that the roof of the car would look better without all the lines/bumps/etc in the roof from the targa components, but its worth it for the occasions when you have the roof off. same idea, different way of doing it. Ive got my vert, and personally, love it.
Don't get me wrong i like the convertibles, just not in Poop Brown, hell i'd rather one in pink over poo brown :rofl:
Oh, don't even. T-tops are like a convertible that doesn't look like a hairdresser's car and keeps the sports-car profile even with the roof off, doesn't have a knife-able soft top nor the added weight, complexity and bulge of a folding hard-top, doesn't have the body stiffness problems of a convertible, doesn't require retarded and complex wind-deflectors to be livable at highway speeds, has a moonroof when the roof is on, doesn't have the poor insulation or sound deadening of a soft-top, doesn't have compromised boot space like a folding roof, doesn't have the bullshit plastic rear window which inevitably turns yellow and cloudy and lacks a demister and windscreen wiper AND you can leave the roof at home if you really need to. T-tops are better than convertibles, both soft and hard, in literally every single possible way except that the roof doesn't flip at the touch of a button. And a lot of soft-tops don't even do that. T-top supportner #1 over here.